As roofing systems come and go, there are a few that remain solid performers throughout the years. Based upon economics, building use and other factors, the type of roof systems can range drastically “simple” to “complex” or costly to inexpensive. Working on a wide range of projects from tilt up to high rise, etc., I have found that many people in our industry haven’t had a lot of experience with IRMA or PRM systems. The basic premise is simple. The term PRM says it all; Protected Roof Membrane. Now use the IRMA as in Inverted Roof Membrane Assembly and you see that that in lieu of having the roof membrane on top or above the rest of the assembly, you install it first then “protect” it. Like taking the an insulated roof system and inverting or flipping it upside down. How do you do this? It starts with the substrate. For this type of roofing system you would need a structural deck, typically concrete. Some have used lightweight insulating concrete, but most IRMA systems will be installed over a structural concrete deck. I have used this type of roof system over a plywood deck with success, however it was engineered specific to this system and it was a small equipment area. You wouldn’t normally install an IRMA roof over a plywood deck. Mainly because of the cost and when dealing with plywood decks, one would typically be dealing with a large roof area, which brings the cost way up based upon the extent of square foot area. The second item that you would consider is the membrane choice. The one thing about this system is having a myriad of options for your roofing/waterproofing membrane. You are not confined to one or two options. Use can use any of the following or even more if you so choose:
Hot fluid-applied rubberized asphalt;
Cold Fluid-applied urethane coating;
Single Ply;
Built-up asphalt roofing;
Modified Bitumen roofing;
Obviously, some are better than others. Some offer more advantages versus others. The main thing to understand is why you would utilize this type of membrane assembly. In most roofing system, you install the insulation over the substrate, followed by the “waterproofing” membrane, with the surfacing (as in BUR or Modified roof systems). With a single ply, the membrane is the first and final layer or surfacing. With the two fluid-applied systems, you would not see these in the more tradition roofing systems and they only come into play with the IRMA or PRM because of the covering or protection. Lets talk about what happens after the roof system is installed over the insulation. In time the building will have foot traffic, maintenance, equipment change out, typically atmospheric degradation such as sun, wind and rain. All of these are constant and cannot be taken out of the factors that affect the service life of the membrane. With the normal roof system, the traffic on the membrane eventually affects the service life. When water is allowed to enter through the membrane from any deficiency, then the insulation can now be affected. Finally, finding the leak becomes problematic due to the fact that where the water enters the membrane and where it shows itself in the building can be two distinct locations. Maintenance or repair to the roof system may involve extensive testing via Infrared scanning or destructive testing by opening up the roof system to determine how wet or deteriorated the insulation is located. Both of these are costly and time consuming, not to mention the affect it has on the overall system. When leaks do occur within an insulated system, we have seen a lot of repairs performed without doing the homework to find out what has happened to the materials below. The roof may still leak, the wet insulation can still be holding water and worse yet, you have lost the insulating R-value due to the wet insulation thus rendering the insulation useless. The traffic also affects the overall service life. With a building that has a high level of equipment, maintenance and foot traffic the roofing membrane can suffer and the service life is shortened sometimes drastically.
So why use a IRMA or PRM system? Going back to the definition, we want to protect the membrane. How do you do that? Simple put it on the substrate (concrete in most cases) and cover it up so that it cannot be damaged. Start by installing the membrane over the structural deck. With all of the options listed above you want to “finish” the system meaning install the flashings, surfacing or protection sheet over the roofing/waterproofing membrane. This system can be worked over, walked on, even construction can occur after the roof membrane has been placed. In new construction, this allows the building to be watertight much earlier in the construction period so that interior work can move along faster than normal. As they say in the construction trade “Time is money!” Now that the membrane is in place, what is next? Now the insulation can be placed over the membrane. Except this is where the biggest change takes place. The typical roofing insulation is Polyisocyanurate insulation. To make it simple, this type is not suppose to be exposed to the elements. So you would not use it in an exposed assembly. EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) or bead board or “Styrofoam” is another typical roof insulation. This also should not be used in an exposed manner. So what can you do? When using an exposed insulation, you would utilize an EXPS or XPS or Extruded Polystyrene. One location to learn more about this type of insulation is www.xpsa.com. You will learn that XPS insulation has more R-value per inch than traditional insulation. It is resistant to moisture, which is why it is used in this type of assembly.
It has greater structural capacity or basically is stronger. It is and can be used in many locations on your building. I recommend reading more about it as an option for insulation when designing systems.
So once you have the insulation protecting the membrane, what do you do then? Well the insulation has to be held in place. Otherwise wind can literally blow it away. As in traditional systems, you have to provide a surfacing. The surfacing of an IRMA or PRM provides two benefits. 1) Holds the insulation in place; 2) Provides a walking surface. Now there are other components such as flashing membranes and drainage board, filter fabric and insulation tape for joints, but a “Design” blog is for later. This is for bestowing the basic principle of the IRMA roof system. The two components used are typically rock or ballast and concrete as in pavers or poured. In both cases, the most important factor to consider after the membrane of course is Wind Uplift. With all roof systems, the wind uplift should be reviewed so that you meet the local requirements and do not allow a wind failure to occur. By providing the correct amount of ballast per square foot (Typically 15 pounds psf for the perimeter) you will meet or exceed FMG I-90 wind uplift rating. (FMG stands for Factory Mutual global). When using pavers, the typical paver size is 2′x 2′ x 2″, any larger and the handling of the paver becomes difficult. The paver is used in window washing locations, foot paths between access and equipment, etc. The ballast is used in the field areas where foot traffic does not occur or is not required.
Now you can see the one thing that stands out on this type of assembly. For me it is simple. If I get a leak, I don’t lose my insulation. I can remove the materials over the membrane, find the leak location due to the fact my membrane is fully adhered to the substrate, provide repairs and put the materials back into place. Finally, the wear and tear on the membrane is eliminated, thus reducing long term maintenance costs. Remember I also have a greater thermal envelope on my building due to the higher R-value per inch. There are so many advantages to this type of system I could on and on. However, it does have one thing that keeps it from become more widely used. The Cost! The ballast and pavers are costly, the insulation is typically more expensive and if you are using the hot rubberized asphalt
system, that too can be more expensive. We would recommend a Life Cycle Cost analysis for anybody considering the use of this type of assembly.
I first became interested in this type of system when working with SOM(Skidmore, Owings & Merrill) in Los Angeles, CA. Their firm has been around since 1936 and began in Chicago. The IRMA or PRM system is a staple of their designs. If you go up on a building that has ballasted insulation, membrane below and walkways of either pavers or concrete, you are most likely on a SOM designed building. Go to their website www.SOM.com and you can learn more about them.
So what do we know? If you protect the waterproofing or roofing membrane it will last longer. If you utilize an insulation that does not break down under water, you won’t have to worry about the weathering of the insulation. If you use a solid walking surface, you won’t have to worry about damage to the membrane or insulation. All of these add up to greater service life and lower maintenance costs. So protect your investment and begin protecting your roof. You can’t go wrong.

This article is garbage. It is so very poorly written as to render it meaningless. At times it is possible to decipher your meaning, but for heaven’s sake spend time proofreading it & write a final draft. If you care even a litle about how your ideas are received, you should at least attempt to observe the major grammatical rules that govern the English language.
I cannot include my exact contact information because of my professional association & the liability that accompanies it.
May I copy this article and send it on to a potential customer? I did not know the first thing about an IRMA up to now.
This was very informative. Thanks.
Ed
IT IS PITY THERE WERE NO ILLUSTRATIONS OF WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. A PICTURE IS WORTH…..
So many words. So few credible facts. We are not roof experts, yet focus on net R-values, the requirements for vapor barriers, and the need for protection from abuse (e.g. foot traffic, mechanical abuse, UV, etc.). And from where does the vapor drive originate – - inside or outside? And how does that affect the design? We are very much interested in better understanding the optimal roofing system in different environments. This should not be “rocket science”.
Joe, great blog. Can you use the same IRMA as described above if you expect foot traffic, i.e. a patio or deck?
Joe – This is a fine article. We’re installing an IRMA roof over the garage in our condominium building. I understand the materials and the construction. In our case we are adding a grooved drainage board on top of the membrane and under the insulation. Here’s the question: how does water flow to the drains: (1) on top of the insulation layer to the drain; or (2) down through (or between) the insulation layer and then along the membrane to the drain?
In a PRM/IRMA roof system, is the membrane fully adhered to the structural concrete deck?
All my buildings have an IRMA roof system; the guide card for the annual inspection is based on a BUR roof system, ie all the components are exposed and visible. I would like to find out how an IRMA roof system is inspected on an annual basis and what resources are needed to accomplish it. Thanks in advance for your help. John Katon
There is clearly a bundle to identify about this. I think you made some nice points in features also.
Hi Joe-
I have also heard Joe Lstiburek tauting the IRMA roof. One aspect of roof design that is obviously missing from this discussion is how you deal with slope to drain with the IRMA system. I assume you are depending on the concrete having the slope built into it. With a plywood deck this is another obstacle which would add to the cost and make it one of the first thing things to get VE’d out of the project. It is hard to beat the economy of a single ply ballasted EPDM roof…..
Graham;
VE exercises will always target this type of assembly. It comes at a higher cost than most roof systems. My point of using SOM Architects was they design mostly high rise buildings with smaller roof systems. The concrete deck would typically be sloped as well. But to answer your question regarding slope, you can use this type of assembly over a dead flat roof. By applying the membrane first, then sloping the insulation and using a drain board over the top, you can capture most of your water and run it to the drains. This cannot be done with a Pedestal system. I will not agrue about the merits of a Ballasted EPDM since I am working in the SW portion of the country, however I have seen my share during my earlier years of traveling in the Midwest. Each system has its place and I am sure there are successful applications out there. Bottom line, the IRMA system is a great assembly for many building Designs. Cost being one of the driving factors against it, Longevity will prove to lower the cost in so much as replacement is not necessary when factoring in the Life Cycle Costs. Many do not perform this type of exercise when only thinking about up front costs. Thank you for the post, I hope to have some new Technical blogs in the very near future. Regards; Joe
Marinda;
If I could spend hours and post endless pages, I could possibly provide all the information there is. But as you know, there is so much to review that I could only hit on the high points. I hope that it was sufficiently informative and that you enjoyed it? I hope to have some more Technical blogs out in the very near future. Stay tuned and thank you for checking in with our site/blog. Regards; Joe
I will check it out. Haven’t heard of this issue, but thank you for the heads up.
Regards; Joe
John;
Sorry I have not replied sooner. We moved our offices and I have been busy with the new set up, etc. To get to your question, here is what I believe:
First of all you have to identify the overall surfacing. Is it pavers, ballast, a combination or do you have a concrete overlay? with regards to the type of insulation, you do not want damage any insulation so care needs to be taken when removing it. I recommend that in order to visually inspect the membrane, you do it at key points in the assembly. Drain locations (where much of your water will be noted); Flashing areas where transitions occur in the membrane; AND some locations where you have your heaviest foot traffic. This way you will be checking not only the membrane, but the insulation condition as well. At the flashing transitions you want to review the stress imposed on the membrane. I do not recommend test cuts within the first 10 years unless there are leaks occurring. A test cut must be immediately repaired with like materials so proper planning is required. D 7 performs roof inspection annually for many clients and travels across the country to perform this work on a regular basis. Give us a call sometime to discuss more of what you can do regarding your maintenance program or other roofing needs. Thanks for the post; Joe
Randy;
Good question! In almost all IRMA systems, the membrane is adhered to the deck. Don’t be confused by loose laid ballasted systems such as EPDM or PVC’s where the membrane is applied OVER the insulation then the ballast is used to hold the assembly down. A true IRMA system will always have the membrane applied to the substrate first. The paver, ballast or combination of surfacing will need to be sufficient weight to hold the insulation in place based upon the Wind Uplift Requirements for the project location. (Refer to FM Global for Wind Uplift). My recommendation? Always fully adhere the membrane. Thanks; Joe
Jerry;
Hope everything is going well on the project. With your assembly, the water will travel to the drains in both locations. The grooved drainage allows water to flow under the insulation. This works best if the deck is sloped. We typically will tape the insulation and use a drainage board on top of the insulation to capture as much water and get it to the drain prior to getting down to the membrane. This way if slope to drain is minimal we can use slope in the insulation to our benefit. It is also less costly to slope the insulation then a structural deck. Send me a photo of the completed assembly, I would love to see it. Regards; Joe
Sorry for the long delay. We moved our offices this fall and I didn’t realize what that was going to entail. In response to your question, the answer is yes. Your surfacing will be the largest consideration after the membrane of course. Will you pour concrete, install interlocking pavers, etc.? Anytime you are waterproofing a balcony that is over occupied space and there will be foot traffic, we recommend a paver system that can be removed. This eliminates the demolition of topping slab if repairs are required. Removing pavers can be performed to inspect the membrane, or repair if necessary afterwhich you can put the paver back in place. A good solid membrane is key, but overall choosing this type of assembly is a solid long term approach. Regards; Joe
Gary;
Just getting to your comment. I have to say I am not sure I follow any of it? The facts about the IRMA systems are clear. Can there be debate over which assembly to use over another, yes? But that is not what the blog was about. As for vapor drive or net R-value? I am not sure I follow you on this? Maybe you can go to the RCI (Roof Consultants Institute) website and review some of the Technical information they provide. I would be happy to answer a specific question if you have one. Regards; Joe
I apologize, you are right of course and I am going to follow up with some photos soon. Stay tuned. I hope that you will enjoy them.
Regards; Joe
Absolutely. Send a link or send our web address as well. Please keep in touch and let me know if you were able to benefit from the information.
Regards; Joe
Almost all are fully adhered. To break it down, Fluid-applied waterproofing such as Hot Rubberized asphalt by nature will be fully adhered. A peel and stick system (Grace Bituthene membrane) would be fully adhered. A PVC single ply membrane would typically be fully adhered as well. The main reason is to localize leaks! You do not want water to run UNDER the membrane which makes a leak very hard to detect. So Fully Adhering is really the best method of attachment for this as well as other roofing assemblies. Regards; Joe
Wow, I guess including my contact information and all that serves me right to recieve such a harsh comment. I will definately read through it again to ensure that you are correct in your take. I am not sure however that you are, and based upon much of the response that I have recieved, you may not be. As for your professional association, I don’t need to know and don’t care, because anybody that would throw it out there such as you did and then hide behind that cannot be very credible. Liability? Are you serious?